Case study · 2026

Ads Manager revamp

Rethinking Sprinklr's Ads Manager around clarity, not dopamine — a calmer transaction layer for advertisers.

Role
Lead Product Designer
Contributors
PM, Researcher, Stakeholders
Platform
Desktop Web
Timeline
2 months
Ads Manager revamp — Sprinklr
Vision

One line vision.

Transform Ads Manager into a trusted, intelligent workspace that ensures users can confidently operate, optimize, and scale campaigns without risk or confusion.

Problems

What users told us.

01

Trust and system state reliability

Users cannot reliably determine whether errors are resolved, and lacks true root cause of the error messaging.

02

Error handling is late and fragmented

Errors appear only at the review stage and must manually search across sections for issues to be resolved, impacting poor scalability for bulk operations.

03

Complexity and cognitive overload

The UI density overwhelms non-expert users and the third pane experience can be intimidating with lots of actions and CTA buttons to navigate through.

Overall problem statement

Ads Manager is a powerful, enterprise grade platform however users experience significant friction in trusting, navigating, and safely operating at scale.

The challenge

An aging interface buried critical campaign decisions.

Sprinklr's Ads Manager had grown organically over a decade of feature additions. Power users could move quickly, but new advertisers struggled to find basic actions — duplicating a campaign, adjusting a budget, pulling a report — without contacting support.

The surface area was vast: dozens of column configurations, nested filters, and modal-on-modal flows. We needed to bring order without regressing the workflows experienced operators relied on every day.

The opportunity

One surface that scales from one ad to ten thousand.

We reframed the goal: the Ads Manager isn't a dashboard — it's a workbench. Operators should be able to glance, decide, and act without leaving the table. Every column, filter, and bulk action had to earn its place by reducing time-to-decision for a real, observed task.

Design principles

  • Density without noise — every pixel serves a decision
  • Inline editing wherever a modal used to live
  • Bulk actions that preview their impact before commit
  • Saved views that travel with the user across accounts
Initial designs

Where the experience started.

Before any redesign work began, we audited the existing Ads Manager and sat down with internal stakeholders — sales engineers, solution consultants, and support — to collect the feedback they were already hearing directly from customers. The picture was consistent: creating a paid initiative meant navigating a dense stack of panels, overlays, and summaries competing for the same attention.

Campaign details, budget and bidding, compliance, and the summary rail all lived on screen at once. Nothing was technically missing — but nothing was prioritized either, and advertisers had to hold the entire structure in their head just to complete a routine edit.

Original Ads Manager paid initiative details panel
The original creation flow — a full-screen overlay stacking navigation, form fields, and a summary rail with no clear hierarchy.
Original Ads Manager with the campaign checklist footer overlapping the form
Strategy Group editing with the campaign checklist surfaced as a floating panel.
Problem

The checklist footer blocked the work it was meant to support.

In the second screen, the campaign checklist anchors itself to the bottom of the workspace and floats above the form. It covers the Sprinklr Campaign selector, Special Ad Categories, and the entire Budget and Bidding section — precisely the fields the checklist is asking the advertiser to verify.

The result is a broken loop: to act on a checklist item, users had to dismiss the checklist, scroll to find the field, update it, then reopen the panel to confirm the state had changed. Every validation item cost three extra interactions, and the disruption compounded across every ad set in a campaign.

Final designs

A calmer surface that guides instead of interrupts.

The final design resolves the three problems that surfaced most in research — complexity, cognitive overload, and error handling — into one layout that stays visually clear and lets advertisers move through a campaign efficiently.

Redesigned Ads Manager with docked QA checklist and recommendations rail
The redesigned creation flow — persistent left navigation, a focused form, and a right rail holding recommendations and the QA Checklist.
Inline field error with red border and helper text
User views specific fields highlighted with a red border + helper text, while also having the flexibility of clicking review to see all errors needing attention.
Errors found panel listing issues with view buttons
Clicking into a view button directs users to the field needing action.
Media upload error surfaced directly on the field
This action helps alleviate the problem of error handling being late and fragmented. Users view errors upfront and removes the back and forth users are enduring now.

Problems answered

Complexity

The overlay-on-overlay pattern was replaced with a single persistent workspace. Navigation lives on the left, the form in the center, and guidance on the right — each with a fixed home that never moves.

Cognitive overload

Fields are grouped into collapsible sections with clear headers, so advertisers see one decision at a time instead of the entire configuration surface at once.

Error handling

The QA Checklist is docked into the right rail alongside recommendations. It validates in place, never covers a field, and lets users resolve issues without leaving the form.

NEXT STEPS

Insights into action.

More case studies

View all work →